Jump to content

„Über das Gesagte hinaus“ – Beraten lernen als rekonstruktiver Professionalisierungsprozess im Studium der Sozialen Arbeit.

Journal article

Konvergenzen und Kontingenzen von Praxeologischer Wissenssoziologie und Humanistischer Psychologie

Fast facts

Quote

Streblow-Poser, C. (2025). "Beyond what is said" - Learning to counsel as a reconstructive professionalization process in social work studies. PERSON, 29(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24989/person.v29i2.6

Content

The article examines the convergences between the practical sociology of knowledge with the docu-
mentary method (DM) and humanistic psychology with the person-centred approach (PZA) in the context of the professionalization of social work. On the basis of two counseling interviews from a teaching research project, it is analyzed how orientation dilemmas between norm and habitus are documented in the counseling situation and how these can be dealt with through person-centered conversation. The results show that both approaches understand implicit knowledge as significant and take a stand against an expertocratic understanding in research and counseling practice. While the DM as a research method reconstructs the collective production practice of social reality, the PCA as a counseling method concentrates on the individual experience. The interweaving of both approaches opens up new perspectives for the training of counseling skills in social work.

This article examines the convergences between Praxeological Sociology of Knowledge with the Documentary Method (DM) and Humanistic Psychology with the Person-Centred-Approach (PCA) in the context of the professionalization of social work. Two counselling interviews from a teaching research project are used to analyse how orientation dilemmas between norm and habitus are documented in the counselling situation and how these can be dealt with through person-centred conversation. The results show that both approaches understand implicit knowledge as meaningful and take a stand against an expertocratic understanding in research and counselling practice. While the DM as a research method reconstructs the collective production practice of social reality, PCA as a counselling method focuses on individual experience. The combination of both approaches opens up new perspectives for the training of counselling skills in social work.

References

Notes and references

This site uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and to collect statistical data. You can object to the statistical collection via the data protection settings (opt-out).

Settings(Opens in a new tab)