Jump to content

Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH v. 18.12.2024, KVZ 5/23, Ostthüringer Zeitung

Journal article

Zum Fortsetzungsfeststellungsinteresse für fusionskontrollrechtliches Beschwerdeverfahren

Fast facts

  • Internal authorship

  • Further publishers

    Christian Horstkotte

  • Publishment

    • Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt (Köln) 2025
  • Purpose of publication

  • Organizational unit

  • Subjects

    • Commercial law
  • Research fields

    • Labor and Business Studies - General

Quote

C. Horstkotte and E. Wingerter, "Comment on the judgment of the BGH of December 18, 2024, KVZ 5/23, Ostthüringer Zeitung," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, vol. 2025, no. 23, pp. 1389-1390, 2025.

Content

The possibility that an element of the reasoning within the completed merger control prohibition order of the FCO could have significance for a discontinuation order based on Sections 1, 32 ARC does not constitute an interest in the continuation of the merger control appeal proceedings.

Keywords

Merger control

Antitrust law

Notes and references

This site uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and to collect statistical data. You can object to the statistical collection via the data protection settings (opt-out).

Settings(Opens in a new tab)