Jump to content

Evaluation of Neuromuscular Diseases and Complaints by Quantitative Muscle MRI

Journal article

Fast facts

  • Internal authorship

  • Further publishers

    Robert Rehmann, Anne-Katrin Güttsches, Matthias Vorgerd, Christine H. Meyer-Frießem, Hubert R. Dinse, Elena Enax-Krumova, Martijn Froeling, Johannes Forsting

  • Publishment

    • MDPI (Basel) 2024
  • Purpose of publication

  • Organizational unit

  • Subjects

    • Neurology
  • Research fields

    • Other field of research

Quote

L. Schlaffke, R. Rehmann, A.-K. Güttsches, M. Vorgerd, C. H. Meyer-Frießem, H. R. Dinse, E. Enax-Krumova, M. Froeling, and J. Forsting, "Evaluation of Neuromuscular Diseases and Complaints by Quantitative Muscle MRI," Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1958, 2024.

Content

Background: Quantitative muscle MRI (qMRI) is a promising tool for evaluating and monitoring neuromuscular disorders (NMD). However, the application of different imaging protocols and processing pipelines restricts comparison between patient cohorts and disorders. In this qMRI study, we aim to compare dystrophic (limb-girdle muscular dystrophy), inflammatory (inclusion body myositis), and metabolic myopathy (Pompe disease) as well as patients with post-COVID-19 conditions suffering from myalgia to healthy controls.
Methods: Ten subjects of each group underwent a 3T lower extremity muscle MRI, including a multi-echo, gradient-echo, Dixon-based sequence, a multi-echo, spin-echo (MESE) T2 mapping sequence, and a spin-echo EPI diffusion-weighted sequence. Furthermore, the following clinical assessments were performed: Quick Motor Function Measure, patient questionnaires for daily life activities, and 6-min walking distance.
Results: Different involvement patterns of conspicuous qMRI parameters for different NMDs were observed. qMRI metrics correlated significantly with clinical assessments.
Conclusions: qMRI metrics are suitable for evaluating patients with NMD since they show differences in muscular involvement in different NMDs and correlate with clinical assessments. Still, standardization of acquisition and processing is needed for broad clinical use.

References

DOI 10.3390/jcm13071958

Notes and references

This site uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and to collect statistical data. You can object to the statistical collection via the data protection settings (opt-out).

Settings(Opens in a new tab)